<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Girls on Film: The Academy's Shallow Actress Pool</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/girls-on-film-the-academys-shallow-actress-pool/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/girls-on-film-the-academys-shallow-actress-pool/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/girls-on-film-the-academys-shallow-actress-pool/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/girls-on-film/" rel="tag">Girls on Film</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/bloom_weisz.11309.jpg" /><br />
<br />
With the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/girls-on-film-sparkly-vamps-sweaty-wolves-and-skin-flicks/">werewolves out of the way</a>, back to our regularly scheduled programming. A few weeks ago, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i6b92ac9c285d017688ab4210c9d0bf26"><em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></a> ran a piece called "Shallow pool for Oscar's actress contenders." The basic premise: While the list of female directorial hopefuls is stronger than ever for the 2010 Academy race, the actress nods aren't so hot with <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/meryl-streep/1107119/main">Meryl Streep</a> leading only a handful of other front-runners (Carey Mulligan and Gabourey Sidibe). The piece also noted the other potential Best Actress candidates, the possibility of notable performances in the remaining releases, the struggles women still face in Hollywood, and -- egads -- the fact that some are talking about Sandra Bullock getting a nod for <em>The Blind Side</em>. <br />
<br />
Reading the article through, I quickly had a thought .... and it was most definitely not about that previously mentioned <a href="http://www.movieline.com/2009/11/why-we-must-begin-to-take-new-moons-oscar-chances-seriously.php">werewolf flick getting any award love</a>. Usually a discussion like this might be disheartening or aggravating, but the thought wasn't negative. It was, in fact, quite positive.<br />
<br />
Why don't we use this "shallow pool" as a reason to celebrate unconventional roles and performances?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/girls-on-film-the-academys-shallow-actress-pool/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Girls on Film: The Academy's Shallow Actress Pool</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/girls-on-film-the-academys-shallow-actress-pool/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19245007/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/girls-on-film-the-academys-shallow-actress-pool/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>anna kendrick</category><category>AnnaKendrick</category><category>Best Actress</category><category>Best Actress Oscar 2010</category><category>BestActress</category><category>BestActressOscar2010</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Girls on Film</category><category>GirlsOnFilm</category><category>Meryl Streep</category><category>MerylStreep</category><category>Oscars 2010</category><category>Oscars2010</category><category>Rachel Weisz</category><category>RachelWeisz</category><category>Vera Farmiga</category><category>VeraFarmiga</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Nine', 'Up in the Air' Lead Satellite Award Nominations</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/satellite-award-nominations-nine-up-in-the-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/satellite-award-nominations-nine-up-in-the-air/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/satellite-award-nominations-nine-up-in-the-air/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/foreign-language/" rel="tag">Foreign Language</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/music-and-musicals/" rel="tag">Music &amp; Musicals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/quentin-tarantino/" rel="tag">Quentin Tarantino</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/johnny-depp/" rel="tag">Johnny Depp</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-clooney/" rel="tag">George Clooney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="1" height="150" border="1" align="right" width="150" vspace="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/12/satelliteaward.jpg" />There are a few good reasons to hate on the Satellite Awards. First of all, we really don't need any more end of the year movie and television honors. Second of all, the Satellites seem to be little more than a knock-off of the Golden Globes, which are already pretty unnecessary. Third, they happen way too early, missing out on seeing and thereby qualifying perhaps the biggest film of the year (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/avatar/26982/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>Avatar</em></a>). <br />
<br />
But over the years I've come to appreciate the Satellites and their bestowing organization, the International Press Academy, for their constant surprises when it comes to nominating and awarding unlikely films and talent. Just look at some of last year's acting <em>winners</em>: Richard Jenkins; Rosemarie DeWitt; Ricky Gervais; Michael Shannon. <br />
<br />
Now check out <a href="http://www.pressacademy.com/satawards/awards2009.shtml">this year's nominees</a>, which continue to prove that IPA voters like to go at least slightly against the grain. Okay, so there are a lot of predictable titles in the lot, including <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/up-in-the-air/34956/main"><em>Up in the Air</em></a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/nine/29835/main"><em>Nine</em></a>, which leads with 11 nominations. Yet there are some films I don't expect to be recognized by the Golden Globes, let alone the Oscars, such as <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-maid-la-nana/36282/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>The Maid</em></a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-stoning-of-soraya-m/35752/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>The Stoning of Soraya M.</em></a>, both of which feature in the Best Actress (Drama) category.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/satellite-award-nominations-nine-up-in-the-air/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Nine', 'Up in the Air' Lead Satellite Award Nominations</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/satellite-award-nominations-nine-up-in-the-air/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19258626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/satellite-award-nominations-nine-up-in-the-air/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>international press academy</category><category>InternationalPressAcademy</category><category>nine</category><category>satellite awards</category><category>SatelliteAwards</category><category>the maid</category><category>the stoning of soraya m.</category><category>TheMaid</category><category>TheStoningOfSorayaM.</category><category>up in the air</category><category>UpInTheAir</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Actors Weigh In on Lost Stars &amp; Oscar Hopefuls</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/actors-weigh-in-on-lost-stars-and-oscar-hopefuls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/actors-weigh-in-on-lost-stars-and-oscar-hopefuls/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/actors-weigh-in-on-lost-stars-and-oscar-hopefuls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/swayze113009.jpg" />When you've glutted yourself on Turkey, must take a break from <em>New Moon</em> reportage, and want to get busy with the Oscar race, it's time to turn the writing work over to the celebs. Both <em>Variety</em> and <em>Entertainment Weekly</em> handed the pens over to the stars recently for two very different reasons -- one, to remember stars we've lost this year like Patrick Swayze, and two, to highlight Academy Award hopefuls in the ever-increasing Oscar race.<br />
<br />
Of course, <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2009/11/24/patrick-swazye-michael-jackson-tributes/?xid=rss-feed-todayslatest-Late+Greats+%2709%3A+This+week+in+EW&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+entertainmentweekly%2Flatest+%28Entertainment+Weekly%3A++Today%27s+Latest%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">EW</a> wants you to buy the mag, so they're only including one of the movie tributes online, and that's C. Thomas Howell writing about his memories of working with Swayze. The two worked together on <em>The Outsiders</em> all those years ago, and Howell writes: "The one thing that was great about him was also the most irritating fact about him: He was always somehow better than you, no matter what it was you were doing. It didn't matter if you were on horseback, shooting weapons, roller-skating, or reciting Shakespeare. He was a tough f-er and a free spirit." I don't know if I could pick a more apt description for him. Swayze always had that sense of ease about him, whether it was looking smooth on the dance floor, getting in on the <em>Point Break</em> action, or crying away his self-help guru woes. (<em>Further tributes include </em><em>Matthew Broderick on John Hughes and Keith Carradine on David Carradine.</em>)<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/actors-weigh-in-on-lost-stars-and-oscar-hopefuls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Actors Weigh In on Lost Stars &amp; Oscar Hopefuls</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/actors-weigh-in-on-lost-stars-and-oscar-hopefuls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19257932/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/30/actors-weigh-in-on-lost-stars-and-oscar-hopefuls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>C. Thomas Howell</category><category>C.ThomasHowell</category><category>celeb writers</category><category>CelebWriters</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>guest writers</category><category>GuestWriters</category><category>Patrick Swayze</category><category>PatrickSwayze</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Up' and 'Marley &amp; Me' Among Dog Movie Winners</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/up-and-marley-and-me-among-dog-movie-winners/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/up-and-marley-and-me-among-dog-movie-winners/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/up-and-marley-and-me-among-dog-movie-winners/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/family-films/" rel="tag">Family Films</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="218" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/updogposter.jpg" />Maybe it's because I saw De Sica's classic <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/umberto-d/5880/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Umberto D.</a> </em>again over the weekend, or maybe it's because I'm excited for tomorrow's release of the 25th Anniversary Edition of <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/cujo/17149/main"><em>Cujo</em></a> on DVD and Blu-ray, but I've got movie dogs on the brain. Last night I even randomly spent some time watching YouTube clips of my all-time favorite movie dog, Asta, from the<em> <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-thin-man/1299/main">Thin Man</a></em> franchise (played by Skippy, who also appears in <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/bringing-up-baby/8019/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Bringing Up Baby</a> </em>and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-awful-truth/1002060/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>The Awful Truth</em></a>). <br />
<br />
So it was coincidentally fun this morning learning that <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2009/nov/23/fido-awards-dogs-cinema">the Fido Awards happened over the weekend</a>. The ceremony, nicknamed the "canine Oscars," occurred in London Saturday, when trophies were handed out in five separate categories. To my surprise, the Fidos don't exclude animated dogs, as the talking dog, Dug, from Pixar's <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/up/30386/main">Up</a> </em>won the Blockbuster Bowser award, beating out pups from <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/gran-torino/33336/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>Gran Torino</em></a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/inglourious-basterds/36184/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>Inglourious Basterds</em></a> and another animation, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/coraline/26304/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>Coraline</em></a>, in the category.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/up-and-marley-and-me-among-dog-movie-winners/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Up' and 'Marley &amp; Me' Among Dog Movie Winners</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/up-and-marley-and-me-among-dog-movie-winners/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19250771/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/23/up-and-marley-and-me-among-dog-movie-winners/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>animal movies</category><category>AnimalMovies</category><category>cujo</category><category>dog movies</category><category>DogMovies</category><category>dogs</category><category>fantastic mr. fox</category><category>FantasticMr.Fox</category><category>fido awards</category><category>FidoAwards</category><category>inglourious basterds</category><category>InglouriousBasterds</category><category>let the right one in</category><category>LetTheRightOneIn</category><category>marley me</category><category>MarleyMe</category><category>pixars up</category><category>PixarsUp</category><category>taking woodstock</category><category>TakingWoodstock</category><category>the thin man</category><category>the young victoria</category><category>TheThinMan</category><category>TheYoungVictoria</category><category>umberto d</category><category>UmbertoD</category><category>wendy and lucy</category><category>WendyAndLucy</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Oscar Snubs? Extortion Plot? Do Tell!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/oscar-snubs-extortion-plot-do-tell/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/oscar-snubs-extortion-plot-do-tell/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/oscar-snubs-extortion-plot-do-tell/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" height="298" border="1" align="middle" width="450" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/tyson1-(2).jpg" /><br />
<br />
Are members from the documentary branch of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences being paid to short list some films over others? That's what it sounds like director James Toback was alluding to when he spoke to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/movies/20docs.html?_r=1&amp;ref=movies"><em>New York Times</em></a> recently about how his buzzed-about documentary, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/tyson/30126/main"><em>Tyson</em></a>, was left off the Academy's short list along with several other notable documentaries from the past year. Toback told the <em>Times </em>that at some point during the selection process he experienced something he puts "fully in the category of extortion", adding that he did not go along with it. <br />
<br />
Speaking on behalf of the documentary branch -- which Toback refers to as "some tiny, dirty covert weirdly protective group" -- chairman (and filmmaker) Rob Epstein said, "I have no idea. It certainly hasn't come before me." Among some of the critically acclaimed docs snubbed this year are Michael Moore's <em>Capitalism: A Love Story</em>, the awesome <em>Anvil! The Story of Anvi</em><em>l</em>, and <em>The September Issue</em>. This year's documentary short list <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/oscars-documentary-shortlist-no-anvil-no-capitalism/">was narrowed down to 15 finalists</a> from 89 possible contenders. So, yeah, obviously you're going to see some fantastic films miss the cut, and, subsequently, some pissed off filmmakers, but it's a pretty bold move for Toback to go and claim extortion, don't you think?<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/oscar-snubs-extortion-plot-do-tell/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oscar Snubs? Extortion Plot? Do Tell!</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/oscar-snubs-extortion-plot-do-tell/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19248051/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/oscar-snubs-extortion-plot-do-tell/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>academy awards</category><category>AcademyAwards</category><category>Anvil The Story of Anvil</category><category>AnvilTheStoryOfAnvil</category><category>capitalism: a love story</category><category>Capitalism:ALoveStory</category><category>tyson</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Oscar's Documentary Shortlist: No 'Anvil,' No 'Capitalism'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/oscars-documentary-shortlist-no-anvil-no-capitalism/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/oscars-documentary-shortlist-no-anvil-no-capitalism/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/oscars-documentary-shortlist-no-anvil-no-capitalism/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/statuette.jpg" alt="" />The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences documentary committee has watched the 89 eligible docs that were submitted and whittled the field down to <a href="http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleases/2009/20091118a.html">15 finalists</a>, from which the five Oscar nominees will be chosen. But before we even get there we gotta talk about the snubs. <br />
<br />
Notably absent from the shortlist are Michael Moore's <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1232207/"><em>Capitalism: A Love Story</em></a> and the highly praised <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1157605/"><em>Anvil! The Story of Anvil</em></a>, which last month earned the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/season/2009/10/underdog-movie-becomes-first-screener-sent-to-academy-members-by-pete-hammond.html">distinction</a> of being the first "for your consideration" screener sent to Academy members this year. Last year's best-reviewed documentary, <em>Man on Wire</em>, went on to win the Oscar; <em>Anvil!</em> holds that title this year (98% at <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/anvil_the_story_of_anvil/">Rotten Tomatoes</a>), but it's not even going to be nominated.<br />
<br />
Other noteworthy titles not among the top 15: <em>Tyson</em> (about the boxer, not the chicken company) and <em>The September Issue</em> (about Anna Wintour and Vogue magazine). <em>Michael Jackson's This Is It</em> and Chris Rock's <em>Good Hair</em> didn't hit theaters until October, qualifying them for <em>next</em> year's documentary category -- for docs, the eligibility period is September-August, not January-December. (<em>This Is It</em> might not be eligible anyway, since Academy <a href="http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/rules/rule12.html">rules</a> forbid films that are "essentially unfiltered records of performances," which could apply here.) The highest-grossing documentary of the year, <em>Earth</em>, isn't eligible because it was mostly repackaged material that had already aired on TV.<br />
<br />
The complete shortlist is after the jump.<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/oscars-documentary-shortlist-no-anvil-no-capitalism/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oscar's Documentary Shortlist: No 'Anvil,' No 'Capitalism'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/oscars-documentary-shortlist-no-anvil-no-capitalism/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19245437/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/oscars-documentary-shortlist-no-anvil-no-capitalism/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>academy awards</category><category>AcademyAwards</category><category>documentaries</category><category>featured</category><category>oscars</category><dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Why Roger Corman Doesn't Deserve an Oscar</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/why-roger-corman-doesnt-deserve-an-oscar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/why-roger-corman-doesnt-deserve-an-oscar/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/why-roger-corman-doesnt-deserve-an-oscar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/honoraryoscars-1258507017.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em><br />
[Note: Scott Weinberg has the pro side of this argument -- why Roger Corman does deserve an Oscar -- in an article that <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/heres-why-roger-corman-deserves-that-honorary-oscar/">you can read right here</a>.]</em><br />
<br />
In a <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/17/oscars-2010-presenters/">post</a> yesterday about the honorary Academy Awards given out over the weekend, I said this about one of the recipients, Roger Corman: "Corman, who has directed more than 50 films and produced nearly 400 (!), has never been nominated for an Oscar, probably because all of his movies are terrible. But apparently the Academy is rewarding quantity now, too. So don't give up, Uwe Boll! Just make another 300 movies!" These remarks were met with much disapproval by many readers, and so I would like to elaborate -- assuming any of the people who swore they'd never read <em>Cinematical</em> again are in fact still reading <em>Cinematical</em> (which they are).<br />
<br />
First, a correction. I shouldn't have said "all of his movies are terrible." I should have said something like "his movies are generally terrible." "All" suggests that I've seen all 400 of them, which of course I haven't. I ought to have used more general language. That was my bad, as the kids say.<br />
<br />
I stand by the point I was making, though. If the Academy is giving out Oscars based on the production of quality work -- which, last time I checked, was the basic idea behind the Oscars -- then Roger Corman does not qualify. The vast majority of his output is mediocre at best. Some of it is downright awful. A few films are good enough on their own, but not to where any of them would deserve Oscars individually. Even as a body, those moderately good Corman movies don't outweigh the dozens -- literally dozens and DOZENS -- of cheap, forgettable clunkers. <br />
<br />
Producing a huge quantity of work whose overall entertainment or artistic value averages out to be somewhere between "mediocre" and "mediocre-plus" isn't worthy of Academy Award consideration. That's neat and everything, producing 400 movies over the course of 50 years. Very ambitious of you! But the Academy should be rewarding quality, not quantity.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/why-roger-corman-doesnt-deserve-an-oscar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Roger Corman Doesn't Deserve an Oscar</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/why-roger-corman-doesnt-deserve-an-oscar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19243741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/18/why-roger-corman-doesnt-deserve-an-oscar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>roger corman</category><category>RogerCorman</category><dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Hints About 2010 Oscars Emerge: No More Five-Person Presenting</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/17/oscars-2010-presenters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/17/oscars-2010-presenters/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/17/oscars-2010-presenters/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/quentin-tarantino/" rel="tag">Quentin Tarantino</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/ceremony_bacall-acceptance.jpg" />As you've probably already heard, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is shaking things up at this year's Oscars by having 10 Best Picture nominees instead of five, and by moving the honorary awards (read: the boring part of the show) to a special ceremony of their own. That ceremony will be held in November, and-- holy crap, it was this weekend! The almost-Oscars were on Saturday!<br />
<br />
They're called the Governors Awards, and while they won't be televised, the AMPAS <a href="http://www.oscars.org/awards/governors/index.html">website</a> has some photos and background info. Honorary Oscars went to actress <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/lauren-bacall/1138614/main">Lauren Bacall</a> (pictured), cinematographer <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/gordon-willis/1876022/main">Gordon Willis</a> (the <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-godfather/5180/main"><em>Godfather</em></a> trilogy, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/manhattan/7100/main"><em>Manhattan</em></a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/all-the-presidents-men/2264/main"><em>All the President's Men</em></a>), and director/producer <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/roger-corman/1848162/main">Roger Corman</a> (numerous <em>MST3K</em> films). Astonishingly, the legendary Bacall has only received one Oscar nomination in her 65-year career, for <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-mirror-has-two-faces/3007/main"><em>The Mirror Has Two Faces</em></a>. Willis was nominated for<span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-godfather-part-iii/3887/main"><em>The Godfather: Part III</em></a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/zelig/10901/main"><em>Zelig</em></a>. Corman, who has directed more than 50 films and produced nearly 400 (!), has never been nominated for an Oscar, probably because all of his movies are terrible. But apparently the Academy is rewarding quantity now, too. So don't give up, Uwe Boll! Just make another 300 movies!<br />
<br />
The other award at the special ceremony was the Irving G. Thalberg Award, given to <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/john-calley/1846324/main">John Calley</a>, who produced <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-remains-of-the-day/8593/main"><em>The Remains of the Day</em></a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/closer/18194/main"><em>Closer</em></a> and oversaw worldwide production for Warner Bros. throughout the 1970s. <br />
<br />
The Governors Awards were also a chance for Oscar telecast producers Adam Shankman and Bill Mechanic to drop a few hints about what the big show will be like on March 7. Mechanic said they're not going to repeat the thing the 2009 show did where a coven of five past Oscar winners introduced the acting nominees.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/17/oscars-2010-presenters/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hints About 2010 Oscars Emerge: No More Five-Person Presenting</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/17/oscars-2010-presenters/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19243282/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/17/oscars-2010-presenters/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>honorary oscar</category><category>HonoraryOscar</category><category>lauren bacall</category><category>LaurenBacall</category><category>roger corman</category><category>RogerCorman</category><dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Academy Awards to Include Five Animated Nominations</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/11/academy-awards-to-include-five-animated-nominations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/11/academy-awards-to-include-five-animated-nominations/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/11/academy-awards-to-include-five-animated-nominations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" width="150" vspace="4" alt="Town Called Panic" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/sm_towncalledpanic.jpg" />I'm so pleased to learn <a href="http://www.indiewire.com/article/20_films_to_contend_for_animated_feature_oscar/">from IndieWIRE</a> that five animated features will probably be in the running for a 2009 Academy Award. If fewer than 16 films are eligible, then only three films end up on the list of nominees. But the shortlist <a href="http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleases/2009/20091111.html">released today</a> by The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences includes 20 films eligible for Oscar nominations, assuming that all films on the list have a qualifying run in Los Angeles before the end of the year. That means five films will be nominated for Best Animated Feature.<br />
<br />
Of course the list includes lots of big animated films: Pixar's <em>Up</em>, Disney's <em>The Princess and the Frog</em>, Henry Selick's <em>Coraline</em>, Wes Anderson's <em>Fantastic Mr. Fox</em> and Dreamworks's <em>Monsters vs. Aliens</em>, among others. But I may or may not have squealed and bounced in my seat to read one unexpected candidate: <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/a-town-called-panic/1435706/main"><em>A Town Called Panic</em></a>, the Belgian animated film that won the Audience Award at Fantastic Fest this year, and which <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/28/a-town-called-panic-review/">I reviewed</a>. I hope the film will hit L.A. for the required time, and although it is the world's biggest longshot, I'd love to see it get a nomination. The Best Animated Feature category needs something this bizarre, original and creative. We'll find out for sure when Oscar nominations are announced on Feb. 2, 2010.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/11/academy-awards-to-include-five-animated-nominations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19233133/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/11/academy-awards-to-include-five-animated-nominations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>a town called panic</category><category>Academy Awards</category><category>AcademyAwards</category><category>ATownCalledPanic</category><dc:creator>Jette Kernion</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Up in the Air' Songs Pulled from Oscar Race</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/up-in-the-air-songs-pulled-from-oscar-race/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/up-in-the-air-songs-pulled-from-oscar-race/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/up-in-the-air-songs-pulled-from-oscar-race/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" height="236" border="1" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/up_in_the_air_movie_poster_us_george_clooney_jason_reitman_01_jpg-(2).jpg" alt="" />Well, it's November, which means the awards contenders are steadily coming out of the woodwork, and just as we have the Academy Awards to look forward to, we also have their fine print to tolerate. The first of this year's disqualifications naturally come from the music end of things, the same category that didn't see fit to honor the tremendous original scores composed for <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/11/13/dark-knight-score-disqualified-from-academy-awards-considerati/"><em>The Dark Knight</em></a> last year and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/22/eight-is-not-enough-jonny-greenwoods-blood-score-dqed/"><em>There Will Be Blood</em></a> the year before that.<br />
<br />
According to Kris Tapley over at <a href="http://incontention.com/?p=16533">In Contention</a>, both "Up in the Air" and "Help Yourself" from Jason Reitman's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/up-in-the-air/34956/main"><em>Up in the Air</em></a> have been pulled out of the Best Original Song race. The former was written by Kevin Renick before he met Reitman (the song is presented in the film as it was presented to the filmmaker, with homemade introduction and all), not to mention that it comes halfway into the credits when only the first song over them can qualify. (Really, AMPAS?)<br />
<br />
And a portion of the latter had existed earlier in Sad Brad Smith's career and thus means the song itself was not created in full for the film. It's <a href="http://incontention.com/?p=16395">an earnest and catchy tune</a>, used prominently in the trailers and well in the film (and now available on iTunes, <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yccb5jo">cough</a>), but it now looks like those are two more slots left to be dominated by <a href="http://incontention.com/?p=13458">Disney's latest</a>...<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/up-in-the-air-songs-pulled-from-oscar-race/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19229488/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/09/up-in-the-air-songs-pulled-from-oscar-race/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>academy awards</category><category>AcademyAwards</category><category>best original song</category><category>BestOriginalSong</category><category>george clooney</category><category>GeorgeClooney</category><category>jason reitman</category><category>JasonReitman</category><category>kevin renick</category><category>KevinRenick</category><category>sad brad smith</category><category>SadBradSmith</category><category>up in the air</category><category>UpInTheAir</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>What's the State of Fox Searchlight?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/whats-the-state-of-fox-searchlight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/whats-the-state-of-fox-searchlight/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/whats-the-state-of-fox-searchlight/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fox-searchlight/" rel="tag">Fox Searchlight</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/family-films/" rel="tag">Family Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/cine-mr-fox-dog-eyes.jpg" />In the 2007 awards season, Fox Searchlight had two strong films in the mix with <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/juno/24692/main"><em>Juno</em></a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-savages/25523/main"><em>The Savages</em></a>, and then in 2008, they dominated with <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/slumdog-millionaire/31044/main"><em>Slumdog Millionaire</em></a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-wrestler/34817/main"><em>The Wrestler</em></a>. As many other indie arms were folding (Paramount Vantage, Warner Independent, Picturehouse), Searchlight managed to keep things up on their end.<br />
<br />
2009, however, hasn't been so kind to them. January's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/notorious/32029/main"><em>Notorious</em></a> didn't do bad actually, though March's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/miss-march/35993/main"><em>Miss March</em></a> was indeed D.O.A. June's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/my-life-in-ruins/34897/main"><em>My Life in Ruins</em></a> similarly underperformed, while July's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/adam/36195/main"><em>Adam</em></a> failed to catch on as that same month's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/500-days-of-summer/33968/main"><em>(500) Days of Summer</em></a> had. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/post-grad/35749/main"><em>Post Grad</em></a> was dumped in the doldrums of August, while <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/whip-it/32591/main"><em>Whip It</em></a> failed to find a crowd in October.<br />
<br />
Cut to now: <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/amelia/33125/main"><em>Amelia</em></a> has been effectively neutered as a ready-made Oscar contender, while <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/gentlemen-broncos/33271/main"><em>Gentlemen Broncos</em></a> (from the director of <em>Napoleon Dynamite</em>, which did particularly well for the same studio) is <a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Gentlemen-Broncos-National-Release-Cancelled-15529.html">being pulled</a> from wider release after this weekend after posting modest numbers on two screens and earning <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/gentlemen_broncos/">savage reviews</a> for the most part.<br />
<br />
With Miramax also <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010629.html?categoryid=1236&amp;cs=1">facing tough times</a>, it's a shame to see studios like these have an off-year, though there's time for a turn-around yet so far as Searchlight is concerned. <em>Summer</em>'s summer release means the timing could work out to earn a push for Original Screenplay as a happy-go-lucky alternate to many dour contenders. This month's similarly light <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/fantastic-mr-fox/28110/main"><em>Fantastic Mr. Fox</em></a> is an Animated Feature candidate at the very least, and -- according to <a href="http://riskybusiness.blogs.thr.com/2009/11/crazy-heart-jeff-bridges.html">THR</a> -- the Jeff Bridges drama <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1263670/"><em>Crazy Heart</em></a> is getting a last-minute test run of sorts at the moment to see if it can merit a move to be positioned for this year's race instead of next year's.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/whats-the-state-of-fox-searchlight/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19223429/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/whats-the-state-of-fox-searchlight/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>500 days of summer</category><category>500DaysOfSummer</category><category>amelia</category><category>amelia earhart</category><category>AmeliaEarhart</category><category>crazy heart</category><category>CrazyHeart</category><category>fantastic mr. fox</category><category>FantasticMr.Fox</category><category>fox searchlight</category><category>FoxSearchlight</category><category>gentlemen broncos</category><category>GentlemenBroncos</category><category>jeff bridges</category><category>JeffBridges</category><category>napoleon dynamite</category><category>NapoleonDynamite</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Adam Shankman Talks About Picking His Oscar Hosts</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/adam-shankman-talks-about-picking-his-oscar-hosts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/adam-shankman-talks-about-picking-his-oscar-hosts/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/adam-shankman-talks-about-picking-his-oscar-hosts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/oscarstatue110409.jpg" alt="" />Yesterday was absolutely buzzing with Oscar buzz. First, the rumor that Ben Stiller and Robert Downey Jr. <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/if-ben-stiller-and-downey-jr-arent-hosting-the-oscars/">said no to the gig</a>. Just a few hours later, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/your-oscar-hosts-steve-martin-and-alec-baldwin/">the official announcement came</a>: Next year's Oscars will be hosted by Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin. <a href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/11/03/exclusive-oscar-producer-adam-shankman-talks-about-hosts-steve-martin-alec-baldwin/">Entertainment Weekly</a> then talked with Adam Shankman about the picking process. Some highlights:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Steve Martin was shocked that he was picked again. Shankman's response: "Yes, because I want the show to feel that we are continuing to build on the Oscars and I'm not trying to make the MTV Movie Awards."</li>
    <li>He was teamed with Baldwin because: "I know that they really adore and respect each other. Plus, I know that they'll be hilarious. I wanted there to be extra comedy in the show. It will keep it high entertainment."</li>
    <li>There was a plan to have two hosts right from the get-go.</li>
    <li>On <em>not</em> picking Tina Fey, a rumored choice: "It wasn't that she turned us down but her work schedule right in that time, she's writing the last of her shows, and we realized then that it wouldn't work."</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/adam-shankman-talks-about-picking-his-oscar-hosts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Adam Shankman Talks About Picking His Oscar Hosts</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/adam-shankman-talks-about-picking-his-oscar-hosts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19223164/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/04/adam-shankman-talks-about-picking-his-oscar-hosts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Adam Shankman</category><category>AdamShankman</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Oscars 2010</category><category>Oscars2010</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>If Ben Stiller &amp; Downey Jr. Aren't Hosting the Oscars...</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/if-ben-stiller-and-downey-jr-arent-hosting-the-oscars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/if-ben-stiller-and-downey-jr-arent-hosting-the-oscars/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/if-ben-stiller-and-downey-jr-arent-hosting-the-oscars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/exhibition/" rel="tag">Exhibition</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/robertdowneyjrbenstiller110309.jpg" alt="" />Back in October, Adam Shankman was determined <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/can-adam-shankman-make-the-oscars-fun/">to make the Oscars fun</a>, itching to "kick up the funny a little bit" and celebrate entertainment. But there wasn't a whole new revamp in mind -- he still wanted to continue with the path laid out last year and have Hugh Jackman host ... <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/30/hugh-jackman-not-hosting-oscars-neil-patrick-harris-now-rumored/">but the actor refused</a>. Rumors immediately started bubbling that Neil Patrick Harris was circling, but there were other funny men in his sights. <a href="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/stiller-downie-turn-down-oscar-hosting/">Deadline Hollywood</a> reports that Shankman and Bill Mechanic went to Ben Stiller and Robert Downey Jr. to host as a duo.<br />
<br />
But they said no.<br />
<br />
Talk about a bummer. It's quite easy to imagine the red carpet coverage wind down, and Stiller and Downey Jr. dancing or strolling to center stage. They could easy bring a healthy dose of classic funny, yet still embody the new spin focused solely on entertainment and mirth. Hell, I would easily take Robert on his own. Can you imagine a series of blips where he acts out scenes from the top contenders or top grossing films? He could fall in love and be a lonely old man with a balloon house, travel into space, throw out classic Tarantino dialogue, channel Julia Child, suffer through a painful locker, feel the pressure of <em>A Single Man</em>...<br />
<br />
But that dream is done. Is there any duo who could bring the same excellence? It would never happen, but if Ben and Robert are a no-go, I want insanity with a slice of brilliance by joining Christopher Walken and Jane Lynch. How about you? What other Oscar hosting duos would you suggest?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/if-ben-stiller-and-downey-jr-arent-hosting-the-oscars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19221043/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/03/if-ben-stiller-and-downey-jr-arent-hosting-the-oscars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Ben Stiller</category><category>BenStiller</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Oscars 2010</category><category>Oscars2010</category><category>Robert Downey Jr.</category><category>RobertDowneyJr.</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>So What Do You Think the 10 Best Pic Nominees Will Be?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/02/so-what-do-you-think-the-10-best-pic-nominees-will-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/02/so-what-do-you-think-the-10-best-pic-nominees-will-be/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/02/so-what-do-you-think-the-10-best-pic-nominees-will-be/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a></p><img border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/02/oscar2-%282%29.jpg" alt="" />This year's Oscar ceremony will mark the first time we're looking at ten (count 'em, TEN!) different Best Picture nominees -- and while I firmly believe this is a bad move, it also stands as a case of terrible timing. We're still feeling the "quality pinch" that arose with the arrival of the most recent WGA strike, which means ... heck, 2009 might have had a tough time doling out FIVE legitimate Best Pic noms, let alone double that amount.<br />
<br />
But ten it shall be, and now that we're only a few weeks away from the beginning of the Awards Bait movie season, I thought it would be fun to play a simple guessing game. More specifically, which films do you think will be nominated for Best Picture? True, there are still several films that none of us have seen yet, but you don't need a crystal ball to assume that a few December titles will earn a nomination. (Come to think of it, this particular December looks <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/schedule/?view=bydate&amp;release=theatrical&amp;date=2009-12-04&amp;showweeks=4&amp;p=.htm">remarkably skimpy</a> on Oscar Bait.)<br />
<br />
Based only on the "industry buzz," I'm confident in assuming that Best Picture nominations will go to films like <em>The Road</em>, <em>A Serious Man, Nine, Up in the Air, and The Lovely Bones</em> ... but where do we look after those ones? <em>The Hurt Locker</em>? <em>Precious</em>? <em>Invictus</em>? <em>Moon</em>? (I wish.) Feel free to chime in with your predictions below, and feel free to check out <a href="http://www.film.com/features/story/is-the-best-picture-favorite/30703730">this Film.com piece</a> that asks the same questions.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/02/so-what-do-you-think-the-10-best-pic-nominees-will-be/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19218839/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/02/so-what-do-you-think-the-10-best-pic-nominees-will-be/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>oscars 2009</category><category>Oscars2009</category><dc:creator>Scott Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Hugh Jackman Not Hosting Oscars, Neil Patrick Harris Now Rumored</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/30/hugh-jackman-not-hosting-oscars-neil-patrick-harris-now-rumored/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/30/hugh-jackman-not-hosting-oscars-neil-patrick-harris-now-rumored/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/30/hugh-jackman-not-hosting-oscars-neil-patrick-harris-now-rumored/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/01/hugh_jackman1.jpg" />As award show devotees know, the Academy is always trying to make the Oscars more fun for the viewers at home. This year it seems as though the pre-show hype is starting earlier than usual, particularly with the noise surrounding<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/bill-mechanic/2157361/main?icid=movsmartsearch"> Bill Mechanic</a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/adam-shankman/1829527/main">Adam Shankman</a> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/can-adam-shankman-make-the-oscars-fun/">stepping on board as producers</a>. But they may be one step behind, as the Oscars have already become a little less handsome, a little less musical, and a little less Emmy-winning than last year. Because <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/hugh-jackman/1373085/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Hugh Jackman</a> won't be returning as host.<br />
<br />
No, it's not an epic snub, or retaliation for being so darn good at everything. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010590.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1"><em>Variety</em></a> reports that Jackman "quietly turned down the job" a few weeks ago. The reason is simply that he wants some time off in between <em>A Steady Rain</em> and production on Shawn Levy's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/real-steel/10016595/main"><em>Real Steel</em></a>. Reportedly, he really does want to host the show again, but he didn't want to do it two years in a row. That's a showman for you. Give them just enough to have them wanting more, and avoid wearing out your welcome.<br />
<br />
In my humble opinion, Jackman left some very dashing shoes to fill. Personally, I think Shankman should see this as the start of a new tradition, avoid a comedian, and pick the Tony-hosting <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/neil-patrick-harris/1799442/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Neil Patrick Harris</a> (who's already rumored to be eying the gig). The Oscars are supposed to be all about Hollywood glamour, and what better way to celebrate that then to go old-school and musical? I'll take a jolly musical number over painful attempts to be political and relevant. What about you? What host can make the Oscars worth your while?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/30/hugh-jackman-not-hosting-oscars-neil-patrick-harris-now-rumored/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19216414/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/30/hugh-jackman-not-hosting-oscars-neil-patrick-harris-now-rumored/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>2010 Oscars</category><category>2010Oscars</category><category>82nd Academy Awards</category><category>82ndAcademyAwards</category><category>Academy Awards</category><category>AcademyAwards</category><category>adam shankman</category><category>AdamShankman</category><category>Bill Mechanic</category><category>BillMechanic</category><category>hugh jackman</category><category>HughJackman</category><category>neil patrick harris</category><category>NeilPatrickHarris</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Moon' and 'Fish Tank' Lead BIFA Nods</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/ifc/" rel="tag">IFC</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony-classics/" rel="tag">Sony Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fantastic-fest/" rel="tag">Fantastic Fest</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/cine-bifa-nods.jpg" />Fall brings with it awards season, and among our first round of nominations are those of the British Independent Film Awards. According to <a href="http://www.empireonline.com/news/feed.asp?NID=26141">Empire</a>, Andrea Arnold's acclaimed <em>Fish Tank</em> took the lead with eight, while Duncan Jones' similarly lauded <em>Moon</em> came up with seven, including one for lead actor Sam Rockwell.<br />
<br />
I'm personally happy to see the savage political satire <em>In the Loop</em> getting due notice, especially its expletive-laden screenplay, since it'll likely go overlooked when it comes to Yank laurels (sad but true, although I'll be happy if it's not). Meanwhile, the multiple nods for <em>An Education</em> and <em>Bright Star</em> only parallel their warm reception Stateside and their likely contention in next year's Oscar race.<br />
<br />
And after being quietly <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/05/fantastic-fest-review-down-terrace">blown away</a> by it at Fantastic Fest a few weeks back, I'm also glad to see <em>Down Terrace</em> get some love under the Raindance Award category. Enough of these awards, and maybe that puppy'll earn some distribution in our neck of the woods. (You listening, IFC?)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19212441/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/28/moon-and-fish-tank-lead-bifa-nods/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>abbie cornish</category><category>AbbieCornish</category><category>an education</category><category>andrea arnold</category><category>AndreaArnold</category><category>AnEducation</category><category>armando iannucci</category><category>ArmandoIannucci</category><category>bright star</category><category>BrightStar</category><category>carey mulligan</category><category>CareyMulligan</category><category>down terrace</category><category>DownTerrace</category><category>duncan jones</category><category>DuncanJones</category><category>fish tank</category><category>FishTank</category><category>in the loop</category><category>InTheLoop</category><category>michael fassbender</category><category>MichaelFassbender</category><category>moon</category><category>nick hornby</category><category>NickHornby</category><category>peter capaldi</category><category>PeterCapaldi</category><category>sam rockwell</category><category>SamRockwell</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>"Matt Damon!" New Trailers for 'Invictus' and 'Green Zone'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thrillers/" rel="tag">Thrillers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/universal/" rel="tag">Universal</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/war/" rel="tag">War</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/cine-damon-invictus.jpg" />August gave us the voice of Matt Damon in <em>Ponyo</em>, September gave us the inner voice of Matt Damon in <em>The Informant!</em>, and now October has brought us a look at his next two performances.<br />
<br />
Clint Eastwood's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/invictus/30532/main"><em>Invictus</em></a> is one of the last big likely contenders of the awards season, though it is as of yet unseen (unless those very few who have seen it are very good at being very quiet). Damon plays real-life rugby captain Francois Pienaar, whose team saw the support of Nelson Mandela (Morgan Freeman) as a rallying point around which they might lift the spirits of South Africa in the wake of apartheid. It's political! It's underdog! It's opening in December! It's Oscar bait for certain, and <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/invictus/">Apple</a> has the exclusive trailer.<br />
<br />
Paul Greengrass' <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/green-zone/30373/main"><em>Green Zone</em></a>, on the other hand, was shuffled out of the Oscar race once Universal decided to <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/29/release-date-shuffle-wolf-man-and-matt-damon-banished-to-2010/">sort out its slate</a> after a lackluster summer at the box office, and that may have been a wise move. <a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/premieres/16313721/standardformat/">Yahoo</a>'s trailer (which is also embedded below) comes across as more of a straight-up actioner than a ready-made contender, with Damon back in <em>Bourne</em> mode as a betrayed soldier on the hunt first for WMDs, and then for answers. Based on the best-seller <em>Imperial Life in the Emerald City</em>, it opens on March 12, 2010.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>"Matt Damon!" New Trailers for 'Invictus' and 'Green Zone'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19212448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/matt-damon-new-trailers-for-invictus-and-green-zone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>amy ryan</category><category>AmyRyan</category><category>Apartheid</category><category>clint eastwood</category><category>ClintEastwood</category><category>green zone</category><category>GreenZone</category><category>greg kinnear</category><category>GregKinnear</category><category>invictus</category><category>matt damon</category><category>MattDamon</category><category>Morgan Freeman</category><category>MorganFreeman</category><category>Paul Greengrass</category><category>PaulGreengrass</category><category>rugby</category><category>RugbyWorldCup</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Sam Rockwell Talks Oscar Nom: "Dreams Are Nice"</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/sam-rockwell-talks-oscar-nom-dreams-are-nice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/sam-rockwell-talks-oscar-nom-dreams-are-nice/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/sam-rockwell-talks-oscar-nom-dreams-are-nice/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony-classics/" rel="tag">Sony Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/other-festivals/" rel="tag">Other Festivals</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/samrockwellmoon.jpg" /><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/moon/36289/main"><em>Moon</em></a> has been the little movie that did, thanks to director <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/12/interview-moon-director-duncan-jones/">Duncan Jones's</a> tireless traveling, interviews, audience Q&amp;As, fan interaction, and, of course, because it's a kick-ass sci-fi movie. Jones has even gone so far as to create <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/petition/957845687">an online petition</a> to get Sam Rockwell nominated for a Best Actor Oscar - heck, it even has its own Twitter <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23SamRockwellOscar">hashtag.</a> You can also follow Jones on <a href="http://twitter.com/ManMadeMoon">Twitter</a> for more <em>Moon</em> news, and keep track of his campaign for a Rockwell nom <a href="http://blog.manmademovies.co.uk/rockwell-oscar/">on his blog.</a><br /> <br /> Earlier tonight at a screening for <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/gentlemen-broncos/33271/main"><em>Gentlemen Broncos,</em></a> there was an audience Q&amp;A session with actors Sam Rockwell, Michael Angarano, Halley Feiffer, and Mike White, and writer/director <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/27/fantastic-fest-interview-jared-hess-of-gentlemen-broncos/">Jared Hess.</a> (<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/28/jemaine-clement-interview-gentlemen-bronc/">Jemaine Clement,</a> I'm sad to say, was not there.) As for Duncan Jones's campaign, Rockwell said, "Well, you know, dreams are nice. It's very flattering. Very, very flattering. Very nice. I mean it's obviously the director so he has an agenda [audience laughs] but it's nice to see that. We worked really hard on that film." (The audience, by the way, clapped hard at the mention of Jones's campaign.)<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/sam-rockwell-talks-oscar-nom-dreams-are-nice/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sam Rockwell Talks Oscar Nom: "Dreams Are Nice"</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/sam-rockwell-talks-oscar-nom-dreams-are-nice/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19210652/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/27/sam-rockwell-talks-oscar-nom-dreams-are-nice/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>BAFTA</category><category>BIFA</category><category>Duncan Jones</category><category>DuncanJones</category><category>featured</category><category>Gentlemen Broncos</category><category>GentlemenBroncos</category><category>Moon</category><category>Oscar</category><category>Oscar campaign</category><category>OscarCampaign</category><category>Sam Rockwell</category><category>SamRockwell</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Can Adam Shankman Make The Oscars Fun?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/can-adam-shankman-make-the-oscars-fun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/can-adam-shankman-make-the-oscars-fun/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/can-adam-shankman-make-the-oscars-fun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/adamshankman102009.jpg" />Does a year go by where we don't hear news about some grand plan to bring the viewers back to The Oscars? It's like it's part of the yearly plan now: Step 1: Try to make the Academy Awards relevant. After the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/24/academy-expands-best-picture-nominees-to-10/">increase in nominees</a>, it looks like the peeps in charge are sticking with the change from comedian stand-up to showman fervor. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jjC3J8tIAwyZzh8QGUHBWv4ftTmQD9BF25A81">The Associated Press</a> is reporting that <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/adam-shankman/1829527/main">Adam Shankman</a>, the man behind the <em>Hairspray</em> remake is going to produce the affair with former 20th Century Fox boss Bill Mechanic. The former will bring the pomp and circumstance, of course, while the latter brings the management and producing.<br />
<br />
"Oscar organizers are trying to put more razzle-dazzle into the show. Instead of the usual standup comic, the Oscars called on song-and-dance man Hugh Jackman to host the show this past year." In the team's <a href="http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleases/2009/20091020.html">press release</a>, Shankman noted how "The last time I was on the show was as a dancer, and to come back as a producer is such an unbelievable honor." (He was on-stage in '89.) Also, <a href="http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/2009/10/20/11467516-ap.html?cid=rssentertainmentmovies">Canoe</a> quotes the director as saying: "I personally want to kick up the funny a little bit. Movies are an invaluable source of entertainment during a very tough time in our country's history. Since entertainment is what we're selling, we want to celebrate that aspect and not just have it be that we're sitting around congratulating ourselves and patting ourselves on the back." <br />
<br />
They're always trying to make it fun. That's nothing new. But do you think he can? Is the song and dance man the way to really cut through the boring parts of the Oscars?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/can-adam-shankman-make-the-oscars-fun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19203512/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/21/can-adam-shankman-make-the-oscars-fun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Adam Shankman</category><category>AdamShankman</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Oscars 2010</category><category>Oscars2010</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Gotham Awards 2009 Noms Include 'Big Fan,' 'Serious Man,' 'Hurt Locker'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/19/the-gotham-awards-2009-noms-include-big-fan-serious-man-h/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/19/the-gotham-awards-2009-noms-include-big-fan-serious-man-h/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/19/the-gotham-awards-2009-noms-include-big-fan-serious-man-h/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/11/gotham_logo.jpg" />IFP's <a href="http://gotham.ifp.org/">Gotham Independent Film Awards</a> kicks off the awards season in November each year with an impressive list of nominees, and this year's list is no different. While it includes big names like the Coens for <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/12/a-serious-man-movie-review/"><em>A Serious Man</em></a> and buzzy films like <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/26/review-the-hurt-locker/"><em>The Hurt Locker</em></a> and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/21/sundance-review-big-fan/"><em>Big Fan,</em></a> it also gives deserving nods to smaller films like <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/10/indie-roundup-linklaters-baseball-doc-immigration-tale-amree/"><em>Amreeka,</em></a> a wonderful film about a mother and son from the West Bank who move the Illinois. The awards also include tributes to the careers of Natalie Portman, Stanley Tucci, and <em>The Hurt Locker</em>'s director Kathryn Bigelow, as well as producers Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner, who both worked on <em>A Serious Man,</em> <em>The Soloist,</em> <em>State of Play,</em> and a slew of other projects.
<p>Previous Gotham winners include <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/28/sundance-review-frozen-river/"><em>Frozen River,</em></a> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/28/sundance-review-trouble-the-water/"><em>Trouble the Water,</em></a> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/07/tiff-review-into-the-wild/"><em>Into the Wild,</em></a> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/19/cannes-review-sicko/"><em>Sicko,</em></a> and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/08/10/siff-review-half-nelson/"><em>Half Nelson,</em></a> just to name a few. Check out Cinematical's preview coverage of the awards <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/tag/gotham+awards/">here.</a></p>
<p>The full list of nominees is after the jump.</p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/19/the-gotham-awards-2009-noms-include-big-fan-serious-man-h/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Gotham Awards 2009 Noms Include 'Big Fan,' 'Serious Man,' 'Hurt Locker'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/19/the-gotham-awards-2009-noms-include-big-fan-serious-man-h/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19201265/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/19/the-gotham-awards-2009-noms-include-big-fan-serious-man-h/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>a serious man</category><category>ASeriousMan</category><category>big fan</category><category>BigFan</category><category>Coen brothers</category><category>CoenBrothers</category><category>kathryn bigelow</category><category>KathrynBigelow</category><category>patton oswalt</category><category>PattonOswalt</category><category>robert siegel</category><category>RobertSiegel</category><category>the gotham awards</category><category>the hurt locker</category><category>TheGothamAwards</category><category>TheHurtLocker</category><dc:creator>Jenni Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>